The conversation regarding adding adult children as joint owners may concern a checking or savings account or both. Unsolicited advice usually goes something like this: “If you want to have your children to be able to pay your bills if something happens to you, you need to add them to the account.” While the intentions are good, a recent Spokane Journal of Business article advises otherwise: “Adding adult children to accounts can be problematic.”
People are made to worry even more when they are told that if there is no second name on the account, it will be frozen upon death and no one can access it until a lengthy and costly probate process has occurred.
To do the right thing, many people respond by adding their most responsible adult child to the account. They don’t realize they are creating more problems than they are solving. A better solution exists, and it should be something taken care of when preparing or revising your estate plan.
Why wouldn’t you want to add an adult child to your accounts? Simply put, your last will and testament doesn’t apply to a bank account if it is a joint account. Most bank accounts are owned with a “joint tenancy with right of survivorship.” This means if the primary owner, the parent, should die, the adult child becomes the sole owner of assets in the account, regardless of what your will says.
Assuming that your intention is to split the assets in the account among several beneficiaries, this may or may not happen. The new account owner is under no legal obligation to share the assets, as they are solely and legally entitled to these funds.
Another problem: if the child decides to split the funds and transfer them to siblings, the IRS may see this as a gift subject to the requirement to fill out a gift tax return.
By having a joint owner, you may also expose these assets to creditor claims. What if the child named on the bank account causes a car accident and is sued? Those assets are considered owned by the child and could be attached by a creditor. If your child gets divorced, those assets may also be part of a divorce settlement.
Estate tax reporting gets more complicated. The IRS places an additional burden on accounts held as joint tenants with the right of survivorship. If the child unexpectedly dies first, the law places the burden on the estate to prove the child did not own the asset.
Is there a solution? Yes, a power of attorney, or better still, a Trust.
A power of attorney is a legal document allowing an agent to act on behalf of the parent, providing authorization without ownership. The parent’s goal is almost always to provide authorization and access, but not ownership.
The POA can be made effective immediately upon signing to allow the child immediate access to the account for bill paying. It can apply not only to bank accounts but to all assets. Alternatively, it can also be limited to specific assets. However, a POA terminates at the death of the parent and a lengthy probate process will be required to transfer the assets to the children.
The best way to allow access to your assets and avoid probate is through the use of a Trust. A Trust allows for a Trustee to manage assets in case of incapacity; allows you to keep control over your assets during your lifetime; and all assets held in Trust avoid costly probate. POA's have many benefits, but a properly drafted Trust can avoid the problems with joint ownership with adult children and the limitations of POA's.
Your estate planning attorney can create a POA to authorize an agent to give them as much or as little control as you want, but a POA should work in conjunction with a properly drafted Trust.
Reference: Spokane Journal of Business (Nov. 9, 2023) “Adding adult children to accounts can be problematic”
Book a call with attorney John A. Laine to learn more.